Kate brought back a Jenny Packham gown for this evening’s gala at the Met.
James Whatling/Splash News
Above you see the Duke and Duchess arriving at the Metropolitan Museum of Art for tonight’s fundraising dinner.
Andrea Renault/Polaris Images
The black tie function is in support of the University of Saint Andrews 600th Anniversary. William is the Patron of that fundraising campaign, and the couple has participated in a number of events related to the anniversary. The 600th Anniversary fundraising campaign kicked off in March 2011, that occasion was one of Kate and William’s first joint engagements.
Chad Rachman/NY Post/Pool/Splash News
Kate and William mingling with guests.
British Consulate Twitter Feed (@UKinNewYork)
More about the evening from Simon Perry’s People story.
The event, honoring the school where the two met and fell in love, was considered a highlight of the couple’s trip to the U.S. and the main reason the visit was scheduled for these days, according to the palace. To great cheers from fans across the street and flashing lights of the press and TV cameras, Kate and William arrived, and at the top of the steps, they were welcomed by a group of St. Andrews alumni.
On the menu at the Met: Duo of mushroom-crusted tenderloin of Angus beef and cedar plank Scottish salmon with a Scotch ale reduction, truffle-whipped parsnips and potatoes and miniature sticky toffee pudding with caramel gelato and praline brittle.
The British Consulate posted a video showing the flickering candles lining the stairway at the Museum.
British Consulate Instagram
Two profile shots.
i-Images
Here you see Prince William at the podium (and projected onto a wall), saying “I don’t need to tell you how much Saint Andrews means to me and Catherine.”
Clarence House Twitter
More on tonight’s gala from The Daily Mail:
Some attendees had paid a staggering $10,000 each to attend the event, which will close with a charity auction. The money will fund scholarships and bursaries for St Andrews students from under-privileged communities, as well as new sports and media facilities at the university
©i-Images
William’s cousin Princess Eugenie also attended the dinner.
©i-Images
The most striking part of tonight’s ensemble: Kate’s glimmering, shimmering jewelry, better seen in this photo.
Andrea Renault / Polaris Images
The diamond and emerald earrings and bracelet are a private gift.
i-Images
It is the first time we have seen the Duchess wearing the demi-parure, or partial set. The chandelier style earrings showcase several strands of diamonds with a large emerald, that emerald is also surrounded by diamonds.
i-Images.co
This offers a different angle, as well as a look at Kate’s updo.
©i-Images
A closer look at the earrings.
i-Images
The bracelet echoes this motif, although these are not stellar shots of the piece.
All Photos by i-Images
Many readers will recognize the dress. Kate most recently wore the gown to a National Portrait Gallery event in February 2014; the first time we saw it was for a 100 Women in Hedge Funds dinner in October of 2013.
i-Images/PA Wire
The gown is described as being made of “petrol-hued silk” on the Stylebop site, where it is still available for purchase in a US size 4/UK size 8. It is actually on sale for $2657, discounted 45% from its original $4885 price tag.
Stylebop
Design elements:
- deep v-neckline front and back
- a wrapped front,
- black velvet sash
- hidden zipper
Here you have a better view of it from the front.
i-Images.co
It appeared Kate was wearing her Jimmy Choo Cosmic heels, now out of stock at Jimmy Choo and everywhere else we checked.
i-Images/JimmyChoo
A quick note about the University of Saint Andrews tartan seen in the gentleman’s kilt above: as Brenda noted in her comment (thank you!) there are items available for purchase in this tartan.
University of Saint Andrews
Above, a few of the items available in the Saint Andrews online gift shop.
Below, the Duke and the Duchess leaving tonight’s dinner.
James Whatling/Splash News
William and Kate are flying home tonight. We will have a wrap-up post later this week.
A few other updates to share:
- Last night’s post has been updated to reflect confirmation on Kate’s earrings and word that she is said to have been in J. Crew denim. http://bit.ly/K8Dec82014B
- Today’s earlier post has been updated with dress info and news about little Diamond Marshall, the 6-year-old who greeted William & Kate at the Calgary airport. http://bit.ly/K8Dec92014A
I will post more links below shortly.
LINKAGE:
- WNBC has a good video of the couple arriving at the Met
- The Daily Telegraph’s coverage is here, The Daily Mail’s is here, and the Mirror’s live blog is here
- The NY Times has a nice piece, Even in ‘Jaded City,’ Heads Turn to Glimpse a Duke and Duchess
Kate is unhuman…how could she look so fit being 5 month (???) pregnant? Among all the appearances of this gown, this look is my favorite. 🙂
On a side note, I am amazed each time by someone who feels upset over other’s comment on Kate (or any celebrity of their favorite for that matter), not just on this site I have never commented on this matter until now. Internet is just that: people post whatever they feel like not whether you consider appropriate or not. If people fail to see this fact, maybe internet is not the best place for them to hang out.
Like Lili and a few others here I sort of follow the Duchess merely I am interested in what she wears and how she wears. To me she’s an interesting and new celebrity to see from time to time but I don’t know her well enough to say “ah i really like her (or don’t)”. there’s no doubt that she has a large fan base cross world but i never consider myself as one of them. So it’s kind of beyond me when I see someone so upset just because others say “I don’t like this dress on her” or “what’s with the hair”. But of course, i don’t read each comment letter by letter so i must have missed those “nasty” ones….Oh well.
Last but not the least, greetings to admin and everyone at the most wonderful time of th year! Happy Holidays!
Great comments as ever, TW3. I think you have it there — if you’re out on the web you may need to develop a thicker skin. Happy holidays to you too — hopefully we’ll meet up again soon when Kate next pops out on her rounds!
That is an excellent point: internet browsing -> thicker skin. That being said, people use anonymity to say things they would never say when not incognito. If you wouldn’t say it in public or write it with your real name beside it for all the world to see, then it’s probably better left unsaid. The internet has really revealed the cruel side of some people. IMHO
I think this dress looked best the third time around mainly because of her hair and the jewels she wore with it. The first two times l felt the dress was wearing her, this time around she’s owning this dress. I also know some ppl were disappointed, but I knew she had to wear a repeat at least once on this tour and she seemed to get some flak for wearing the 1,000 dollar Goat coat to Harlem ( a really poor area). I’m glad she repeated this dress, it looks gorgeous with the emerald earrings. I do not think she will repeat it again. I have a feeling that she repeats gowns three times. Remember the Alice Temperley lace one? At 4,000 dollars a dress/ 3 its about 1,500 dollars an event. I think thats fair given that she is constantly scrutinized.
I swear this dress is a different colour every time it’s photographed! I think from this event’s pictures we might have the most accurate (so far) portrayal of the “petrol” colour described on Shopbop. I actually think the dress suits Kate better while pregnant – before the belt didn’t do much but break up the colour and texture, but now it highlights her cute little baby belly.
I am personally not a fan of the jewellery but I realise it was an event that called for a little more royal bling, and it is nice to see her change it up. While I already consider her day-to-day earrings elegant enough for me, obviously fancier occasions call for fancier jewels. The emerald green makes a great contrast to the petrol of the dress and is a great choice this time of year.
Wanted to add, Eugenie looks great too! Would love to see a complete photo of her dress.
Speaking of things for Kate to repeat. I really want her to repeat that coat dress from February 2012. It was her first visit to the National Portrait Gallery. It was grey but had such an interesting collar. She probably could not wear it while pregnant, but I wish she would repeat it. It is lovely.
And I hope someday she wears the gown from the Olympic gala dinner, also from 2012. It was turquoise Jenny Packham gown. That is the Packham gown I hope she wears again. By far it has been my favorite gown from her. As well as her hair style that night, she was stunning. I wonder why she has not worn that one again? It was a show stopper :).
Could the bracelet and earrings be a remake from the Greville diamond and emerald necklace which had been inherited by the Queen from her mother? Pictures around the internet show a strong similarity between the emerald and diamond clusters that were part of the necklace and Kate’s earrings.
The late Queen Mother inherited the piece along with others from a friend, Mrs. Greville. The necklace was worn by the Queen Mother but not by the Queen. So perhaps it has less significance as part of the Queen’s collection and thus became a suitable candidate for remaking.
Just a thought. I love your blog.
Regards
Heather
I don’t think so, unless the stones were recut. I do think these are vintage and a gift from the Queen. Modern jewelry doesn’t look like these earrings. That kind of an intricate setting is very Cartier. You also don’t see that gold color in modern diamonds, and those are old emeralds. Also, those emeralds alone are worth a fortune. Emeralds with that color cost the earth.
This was the outfit I was most looking forward to seeing on this NYC trip. A little bummed it was a repeat but it’s a great dress and I can’t blame her for rewearing something she already owned, since I do it every day. Also the pictures of her holding her bump are pretty adorable.
They are Diana’s emeralds!!!!! Just found picture of Diana in one of my books. She is wearing a green silk chiffon evening dress, with those exact same earrings and bracelet at London event in 1991. Will send another post with the picture.
It would be lovely to see the picture of these emerald ear rings and bracelet had belonged to Princess Diana previously.
Hope you can post pictures of Princess Diana wearing them.
In the super close up pictures, the earrings appear to be yellow and white diamond earrings with emeralds. Someone posted last night on the What Kate Wore FB page (can’t find the comment now) that they were very similar in design to a pair of Lorraine Schwartz yellow diamond and emerald earrings that Blake Lively wore back in March 2011.
http://www.starstyle.com/lorraine-schwartz-platinum-green-emerald-yellow-diamond-earrings-sp64187/
Hi everyone!
What might she be sipping in that pic! It’s not water as it has a champagne colour to it. And, it’s in a wine/fluted glass.
Also, Kate obviously works out and rakes care about her health all the time…so, when pregnant, it doesn’t surprise me that she has lovely toning (wow, her back was super toned) and that she seems ao slim. Also, it is no surpirze to me that she bounces back afterwards since she is so active and athletic. She probably started with a tight core and shoots back to her original figure. Her hair is shiny and full and she just looks “well.” Because she has had so many years getting used to this life, it may not seem as “wow” to her to be the star or the show or to see spectacular jewels. For me, I think it would be a true fairytale and I’d be pinching myself. Having a husband who is my best friend, traveling the world and seeing things very few might ever view in a lifetime, having a loving family, good friends…no wonder she has so much energy, strength and gusto. She’s probably happy, inspired and excited by life. And my goodness, have you noticed how she can work mega high heels and long skirts/gown lengths without a teeter or a tear to fabric. She is a superwoman 😉
Oops,sorry for a few of the typos. I am using an IPad, admin, and I posted my comment before double checking. Thx
The drink could be apple juice. But, even if she took a sip or two of champagne, it couldn’t hurt the baby.
I’m pretty sure she is just drinking water. I believe the glass is tinted yellow, that is why the water does not appear clear. They had wine glasses next to these so I do think they are just fancy water glasses.
A small amount of alcohol in pregnancy causes absolutely no problems, but I doubt she’d drink it in public simply because it would be likely to spark a ‘story’.
There is so much jewelry within the royal family that I think that Kate could wear something daily for many years and not repeat – there is much that is re-fashioned as well. Additionally, I am sure that William, Charles, and her parents have also given Kate pieces along the way.
All in all, I loved the clothing choices of the Duchess for her NY trip. Best of all it was lovely to see her and Prince William so happy and so obviously in love.
she looks stunning and needs to wear her hair like this updo more often it makes her look far more regal and beautiful.
wow I love this look!
I absolutely LOVE emeralds so as soon as I saw this post, I had to do some sleuthing. Granted this is very amateur but it looks like Catherine’s earrings could be a refashioned pair of Diana’s. If you scroll to the bottom of http://www.dianasjewels.net/redandgreenstoneearrings.htm (Diana’s Jewels), the pair she is wearing are a squared emerald with star-bursts of diamonds surrounding. That is what the bottom of Catherine’s looks like to me. If the earrings were refashioned, I would take a guess that the bracelet was created to match because in all of the emerald or colored gemstone bracelets I have seen, usually the stone is repeated all the way around the bracelet.
I agree it is a possibility. I think that the earring is probably convertible, where it can be worn as a stud or added to the bottom of the diamond dangle, as Kate wore them.
I think that it can be assumed that these pieces have been in the family for years and may have been restyled either due to personal preferences or to better secure the stones.
The design of this piece looks very Cartier based on other similar designs of starburst, multiple cuts of diamond accent stones and a large center gemstone.
Diana is my absolute fashion idol over anyone else on earth, and she loved wearing emeralds!!! I would bet those are her pieces that have been refashioned, although they look very big and showy like how Diana liked to wear statement pieces.
I hope they are Diana’s for no other reason than I know she wore them before Kate..:)
Kate is beautiful, as always. Her looks are well-crafted with consideration to the occasion – matching the dress and jewels to the St Andrew’s colours is a prime example of this.
Many have commented asking about Kate wearing a tiara – I personally don’t think we will ever see her in a tiara publicly until William’s coronation. It will strongly signal her moving into her new role.
Oooh I adore this dress so much, I am glad to see it again in a different style. The up-do is gorgeous, and what sparklers! It must have been cold though, given it’s December in New York, with those open shoulders.
Does anyone know anything about Eugenie’s dress? I have seen a short version of it and I think it is great, but have no idea who designed it. Anyone out there in the know?
I loved the look. I feel like we can forgive her the 3rd repeat in quick succession of this dress due simply to the fact that she is pregnant. I doubt when she wore it the second time, she was really planning on wearing it again so soon, but I’m sure it is difficult to find figure flattering evening gowns when you are pregnant and why would you want to spend a lot of money on getting a gown to fit your pregnant figure that you probably will not be able to wear again once you are not pregnant. Especially when you already have a gown that will work perfectly. It seems like a waste of money to me and Kate has always been pretty frugal with her clothing choices.
Kate looks stunning! I think the Jenny Packham dress was the perfect choice.
First time commenter/long-time reader : )
I absolutely adore Kate and most of her style choices. One question: is anyone else getting a bit bored with her makeup? I feel like she always wears the same dark eyeliner and neutral lip. I’d love to see her go a little lighter on the eyeliner and perhaps try a bold lip once in a while. Thoughts?
Also, what do we have to do to get a tiara on this girl? Not that that would be appropriate tonight. I just had to throw it out there. Can’t someone throw an event requiring a tiara?!?! : )
Perhaps she doesn’t enjoy wearing them. I understand tiaras can cause terrible headaches.
My 4 year old can attest to that with her many play tiaras 🙂
More tiara! I agree.
If you’re interested in when tiaras are appropriate, the Royal Order of Sartorial Splendor blog has a good post about it:
http://orderofsplendor.blogspot.ca/2011/10/royal-splendor-101-tiara-rules.html
It seems that those who throw tiara-worthy parties specify it in the dress code (e.g. “white tie and tiara”). Oh to get an invitation like that!
Kate has been photographed wearing a tiara since her marriage. Look up photos of the diplomatic receptions. As for wearing a tiara in the States, it would be inappropriate for her, since she is not a head of state. . The Queen is about the only person I can remember wearing a tiara at an official occasion in the U.S.
Princess Diana wore Queen Mary’s pearl and diamond tiara in 1985, when she and Charles visited Washington. First state dinner she wore the black John Travolta dress and pearl choker with a large center sapphire. The next next evening she wore a cream lace ball gown and the diamond/pearl tiara..
She’s been photographed wearing a tiara since the wedding only once, since she’s attended the Christmas season diplomatic reception only once.
The late Princess of Wales did wear a tiara on a visit to the States. However, the fact is that there are fewer and fewer occasions for tiara-wearing these days, and they would likely be eschewed even at events at which they were once worn. Heavy bling just isn’t trotted out that much now. Diana and other royal women wore tiaras to a variety of events that didn’t really involve any “state” or otherwise official significance, and they would probably leave them at home today. Greater social informality even among royals and a desire to avoid too much ostentatious display lest it attract vigorous criticism from the anti-monarchists are certainly the explanations. Only the Queen can still really get away with spectacular displays of jewelry, both because of her position and because of her age.
Greeting, Ladies. Let me begin by stressing that I am a “Kate” fan, and that I applaud wearing clothes multiple times. That being said, I was quite disappointed to see a “recycle” for an event of this magnitude. The dress is beautiful and certainly should appear again, but in my opinion, not this soon after 2 rather recent appearances. The guests opened their pocketbooks for this cause dear to the Cambridgeshire’ hearts – and was deserving of a “first showing” long gown. Her hair and jewelry were perfect and appropriate to the level of the setting, the gown – no matter how beautiful – needed a little rest before re-appearing. There is etiquette in fashion just as there is in other areas.
It needed a “rest”? It’s been 10 months how much of a vacation does it need?
The guests paid to support St. Andrews, and seeing the couple was an added bonus. Maybe she doesn’t want to spend thousands of dollars on a formal maternity gown, when she might not be pregnant again, and these colors compliment the event anyway. I don’t think any of the guests would begrudge avoiding wasteful spending.
This dress had been crying out for an up-do, lovely to see it at last! She looks fabulous.
Yes! I’ve thought that since the first time she wore it. This is how you dress like royalty. Let the dress and the jewels shine, and get the hair out of the way. Gorgeous.
Love her hair and jewels! The dress was a perfect pick from her pregnant belly, but I’m not excited to see it for a third time. What a great event for them!
~Ashley @ A Cute Angle
acutelifestyle.blogspot.com
This is a really gorgeous look, and I agree that the dress calls for an up-do. I like that she repeats outfits, because that’s what most women do in real life. This dress is so flattering and really flatters her figure. I think those button-up coats she wears make her look larger than she is, even while pregnant.
Here is what a real New Yorker who was a guest at the dinner wrote about the eventwith many unseen photos. We New Yorkers are hard to impress.
http://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/social-diary/2014/a-night-amongst-will-and-kate
A great read — thank you!
The blue and green combo is definitely a nod at the St Andrews colors. Last time she was there she wore the McQueen blue and green tartan.
I wonder if these are a part of the “Cambridge Emeralds”. I have only seen pics of emeralds with a cab cut (Delhi Durbar pieces) but I do not think that all the pieces have ever been seen in public.
The smoky blue dress and emerald earrings are reminiscent of the tartan colors for Saint Andrew – have a feeling that’s why she picked what she did to wear to the event vs. making a big new fashion reveal – plus as we know now, she’s more often trying to down play the opulence of always new this and that. The new jewelry reveal is off-set with a gown most are very familiar with. I think it was planned for very specific reasons she wore what she did. I’m so glad she pulled the hair up tonight however vs leaving it down. I am really ready for her to drastically cut her hair – I thought with the first child she might chop some of it off.
Her hair is stunning – why would she chop it simply because she became a mom?
When I became a mother, many years ago, I grew my hair out long. The fact is that long hair was easier to manage – an up do for the evening was easy and quick as opposed to trying to find the time to curl and brush out hair that might or might not remain lovely looking for the evening. Also, a pony tail or a braid was easy to do for the day both at work or for play. I only shortened my hair style when my children were much older and I once again had more time to fuss with hair.
Today I find myself (in my sixties) letting y hair grow long once again. Having just had surgery, I have found longer hair easier to manage – I can pull it back while in therapy and then brush it out for the rest of the day. It is easier to twist up and look elegant in the evening than to spend time fussing with curlers and hair tongs.
She has beautiful hair – in fact that along with her smile are two of her loveliest features. Why would she want to do anything to diminish that?
I was very happy to see this Packham dress again. It is absolutely gorgeous and with the updo it looked even more regal than the other times it was worn. At first I was disappointed there was no necklace but on reflection with the gorgeous earrings and bracelet a necklace would have been too much.
I enjoyed all her clothing choices for her NY visit. Although many were upset with the mulberry (though I thought it was closer to cerise) coat I thought it was a good choice – it was non-fussy and spoke of hope which is what I believe one should take away from the 9/11 memorial – that the actions of those who seek to destroy the values of the Enlightenment (progress and equality of all) will not be destroyed – that they will live on.
Mulberry is actually the label, not the color. The Duchess has worn Mulberry clothing before and has at least one Mulberry bag, if I’m remembering correctly.
As a native New Yorker, I have got to express my disappointment. New York is the fashion capital, and to wear a retread when asking for big money seems, not thought through. Now you can say all you want about being thrifty and so on, but this is MET and one of the biggest social events in NYC this season, so a new frock would have been better. I would rather she didn’t buy so many new coats, pregnant or not, and that she would take them off. The whole coat dress thing is dull for me now.
She really could have won New York over with this MET Gala, and this just didn’t say “Royalty” to me.
This is for Susan and the whole WKW community to consider:
I’m quite disappointed by the “personal attack” level of comments made among posters recently in this previously spirited, but respectfully so, discussion forum.
II haven’t commented in a while myself, and had looked forward to rejoining the conversation with this second US trip by William and Kate. Instead, I have found myself taken aback, or even downright offended, by several such comments, the likes of which were not previously seen in this close community Susan has carefully built that many of us have enjoyed since inception, or at least not so I have noticed.
Previously, our aesthetic and sartorial differences in taste and sensibilities for occasion-appropriateness of Kate’s hair, shoes or clothing, her fashion “hits or misses”, our suggestions for improvement for her outfits were topics of lively, often humorous debate, marked with agree-to-disagree exchanges, done in a mutually-respectful way.
Not this week, though: I’ve read comments such as (1) “anyone with fashion sense knows you don’t have to match jewelry exactly to the dress” (or whatever that actual quote was, relating to the midnight blue evening dress and emerald earrings; it was so off-putting, I didnt want to dwell in its negativie-ness and petulance by reading it again); and (2) “I’d like to see what you’d wear if you were William’s wife”.
These have brought an unpleasant, jarring note to this community that I don’t believe belong in, or yield anything positive for, our upbeat, lively, and respectful forum. I sincerely hope that this is not what we have to look forward to prospectively; comments such as these being the accepted norm.
I am very interested in Susan’s perspective and that of others who enjoy this blog. I don’t know if what we may need are perhaps “commentary civility guidelines” or perhaps a heavier-handed moderation that strikes out the commentator-to-commentator personal attacks and pot shots, or other suggestions this community may have, but I wanted to start this dialogue.
Perhaps I am in a small minority who feel this way.
And lest anyone think I’m an overly-sensitive champion of political-correctness: please know that I’m an entertainment and media industry lawyer who regularly defends on First Amendment and other legal grounds the rights of free speech and personal expression, even when offensive song lyrics or racy pictures are at stake. That is because I believie robust expression of artistic self expression and fair comment in the idea marketplace are the hallmarks of our country’s brilliant celebration of diverse arts, culture, people and perspectives.
But I can think of no justification for mean-spirited personal attacks that hit disrespectfully at other commentators. I would hate to see the reduction of this enjoyable community to the nasty free-for-all you find in the Daily Mail public comments to their articles.
Well said.
Thank you for a very thoughtful approach to what is a sensitive topic. You are wonderful to take the time to share such eloquent input about the WKW community. I had been pondering whether or not to address it in a future post and your input has helped me decide it needs to be discussed.
I really hope you do address the negativity on this site. There are some posts re: the coat worn at the 9/11 that were so horrible I was shocked that you allowed them through. A time or two you have edited my posts and I understood but nothing I have ever posted has been as disgusting as some of the recent posts on here. It’s getting more and more difficult for me to read the comments.
Tracey, thanks for your post. It was thoughtful and well done.
I agree that the tone of some people’s posts leaves a great deal to be desired and that perhaps Susan might consider strengthening the commenting guidelines.
I am equally perturbed, however, by the frequent posts that suggest that no criticism at all be directed at the Duchess’s wardrobe choices. It seems that while some people think it’s acceptable to jump all over someone who holds a different opinion, others believe that this should an uncritically adoring fan site. It has even been suggested that the comments section should be abolished, that no one should be permitted to express any negative points-of-view. Remarks such as “I’d like to see what you’d wear….” fall into this “How dare you criticize her?” category.
It is possible to post thoughtful criticism, which is what we are, or should be, here for, without implying a dislike of the Duchess in general AND without attacking some other commenter for holding a different opinion. Anyone who is unable to accept that really doesn’t belong among the participants on the site. I’ve been told that I have no right to express even that point of view here, but I feel strongly enough about it that I have hesitation whatsoever about reiterating it.
I agree, Lili. I’m a frequent reader, though I don’t comment often. I enjoy the play of opinions respectfully expressed.
I’ve also learned a lot about fashion through reading this blog — not just “fashion” in the sense of popular clothing, but fashion as an aspect of communication. Despite my history background, this is not something I know much about. I particularly appreciate the participation of art and fashion historians, who add a real depth to the conversation.
Of course none of that can happen if it’s all “fan talk” — and none of it is likely to happen if comments become nasty.
Lili and others have summed up my thoughts perfectly. Comments shouldn’t be of a personal nature or a put-down of either the Duchess or any of the commentators. Just a civilized exchange of fashion and outfit ideas. Thank you Susan for a wonderful blog. Your good nature shines through your blog I must say.
I absolutely agree with you re differences of opinion. People should be allowed to state if they like an outfit or not but ONLY when they are being polite to other posters. I think Susan should keep this site from becoming one of those places in which any opinion on Kate that deems her south of absolute perfection is rejected as the product of a jealous, frustrated and- my favorite- lesbian mind. I also think that this place should be saved from becoming a troll nest in which ppl constantly bash each other.
I admit that I am not one of those enamoured with Kate. I’m fairly neutral about her as a person and a royal andI Used to love her style: not so much lately though. I also think I’m pretty fair and give credit when credit’s due (like ag the gala, when she was breathtaking). If allowed I will continue to do so. If however Susan starts banning all non-appreciative opinions I will leave: I am not part of the 16 year old Disney crowd who think “Princess Kate is God”; I have a critical mind.
Sorry about the typos- on a park bench freezing to death!!!
I whole heartily agree with your insights.
Definitely support this. Very well put. Thank you.
Such an interesting discussion, Tracey, thank you for raising it. I must admit I had wondered at one point in the past few days if we weren’t experiencing some sort of “troll-storm.” However I don’t think I for one would welcome any more restrictive moderating simply because free speech is so much more interesting.
There’s always more traffic here at tour times and the nasties often sneak in. I think we have to try not to take things personally, certainly not in public and not in print. We have the problem that a troll is someone who is interested in WKW, only in upsetting those who are.
In the past the awkward squad have been successfully seen off by simply ignoring them, or worse, by being perfectly civil. The best way to spoil a troll’s day is to appear unmoved, and they generally only appear the once. We are effectively in a public place here and may have to accustom ourselves to bumping into all sorts.
Like you, I greatly value the level of intelligent discussion which is the hallmark of this site and think it is quite robust enough to fend off the nay-sayers.
Lili, Tracey, I agree 2,000%! Thank you for your comments. I love to read spirited, good-natured debate from differing opinions about her fashion choices, but it strikes a painful nerve when I see anyone on this blog, the admin, or the Duchess criticized.
No one is above criticism (except perhaps The saints). A great part of maturity is being able to accept that people have different opinions and that something which some like/love/agree with/find beautiful could be the exact opposite to others. Another important part is not becoming too invested in what is ultimately a stranger- Kate- and a hobby- the website. It’s unhealthy. Not being able to tolerate any form of polite criticism towards Kate’s clothes is, in my opinion, very strage in an adult. Critcism of Susan is however misplaced. After all she is providing a great, free service that eats a lot of her time.
Finally, people are free to adopt any position vis-a-vis Kate/Susan they want but it shouldn’t be inflicted on others or used to censor their free speech. Just my two cents….
You win Tracey. I meant the comment asking what others would wear in jest. It was directed at no one in particular but was a reaction to what appeared to me to be multiple overly critical jibes at the Duchess. The actual intent was meant to be the same message as your own, it just came out wrong apparently. So this “Troll” will vanish from these pages as I now completely understand that its only open to those who were around at its inception. I truly wish you all the best. To Susan who always manages to provide CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM: I will continue to read and enjoy your WKW posts.
But a troll is someone who doesn’t come back and own up, Jennifer — you brave soul! I must admit when I see comments I’m not so sure about I do try to ask myself if it might not have been said in jest. We never hear the tone of voice in which we post and therein lies the difficulty.
There’s no way this page is open only to those who’ve been here from the start or they’d never have let me in, I was way late coming on board.
The idea that the page should be only available to what the Thought Police decree as being Quite Nice would really kill it dead. I’d most certainly welcome you back, Jennifer, as and when you feel so inclined. Lively company is good for us!
Sorry — a troll is someone who is NOT interested in WKW…
Her jewelry is stunning! Why has she never worn it before? I hope she recycles those gems with another elegant outfit.
Is it my imagination or does the bump keep changing size?!
Yes. Kate’s bump is truly magical. In some photos the bump almost looks ready to pop and in others you might not even guess Kate’s pregnant.
LOLOLOL I was just thinking the same thing! She looked ready to have the baby any day in those coats, and then she looks almost as slim as ever in this dress. BTW how is she still able to fit into this dress ?!?!?
I’m delighted to see this dress again – it’s such a classic and suits Kate so well. I remember wondering before if she would leave giving it the full treatment of updo-plus-bling until she had her husband safely by her side. The only disappointment this time is that she still shies away from wearing the shoulders down. As the dress is designed with that in mind I imagine it must be safe to do so, though it remains an attractive neckline. Of course, the dress as a whole also has the considerable blessing of being comfortable over the Bump.
I notice that many of the other ladies are also wearing black or dark shades and the Packham repeat seems to fit the general dress code. The lovely matching earring and bracelet set are a heavier style of jewellery than the Duchess usually wears which I think the dress calls for. I appreciate the green sapphires reflect university colours and they chime well enough with the depth of blue in the dress fabric.
That’s a lovely chignon and Kate looks wonderful, if a little tired. It’s been a punishing three days for the couple but a great success and I think they have made New York their own.
Or maybe that should read “green emeralds.” Too many late nights with the Duchess take their toll!
The jewels are incredible but the close up of the earrings looked painful – they must be really heavy… Yay for updo!
This is the hairstyle this gown needs! I really don’t understand why she wore her hair down (and covered the lovely v detailing) at the hedge fund event. Elegant hair with big jewels = A+.
While Kate obviously looks beautiful (as always), I am a little sick of this dress! I would have loved to see something new (I always get so excited for evening events at the possibility of Kate wearing a beautiful new design).
I’m also getting quite bored at the amount of similar, dark dresses she has been wearing recently. Not only have almost all of her cocktail dresses lately been black, but her clothing choices on this NY tour have been almost exclusively dull, drab, and black (with hot pink Burberry worn today as an exception, of course). I loved her experimentation with color during the Australia/New Zealand tour and while I understand that NY winter calls for something slightly more subdued, I would love to see Kate in something more interesting than constant black.
Also these earrings are STUNNING but I can’t help but feel that the emeralds clash significantly with the blue/black of the gown.
I so knew the “clash” comment was coming. Nobody with any fashion sense requires that everything match. It takes no imagination to wear the same colored stones on every finger and wrist, let alone matching one’s dress.
As for the dark colors on this trip, as opposed to the bright colors in Australia and New Zealand: it’s winter. That trip was in the summer.
With all due respect, I consider that I have a fashion sense. I was not suggesting that her earrings and dress match, but simply coordinate elegantly. I simply do not think that the colors work properly together.
Perhaps you did not notice that I acknowledged seasonal difference in my comment. However winter does not have to equal dull. There are plenty of occasions where Kate (and so many other stylish women) have nailed classic, appropriate winter colors without looking boring. The Seraphine burgundy coat from the first night is a perfect example.
It wasn’t in summer for us. It was middle of autumn/fall, actually closer to winter than summer.
I so knew that one day a person will come and break the polite and civilized tone of the conversation that goes on this website….
Ann, pay no attention to meab spirited jibes.
I agree with you that the stones and the dress do not match perfectly in theory but I think the overall effect was stunning nonetheless. She really looked like royalty through and through- finally, I would add.
I agree they don’t go together perfectly, but I think it was meant to reflect the green and blue in St. Andrew’s tartan.
Yes, Ann, I completely agree with your comment! New York is one of the fashion mecca’s of the world, and there was nothing outstanding about any of her outfits. All of the black is getting very, very old. The only outfits liked from this trip was the first coat she wore on arrival at the hotel, and the pink coat you mentioned that she wore to the 9/11 memorial. I just don’t understand why she would have picked such dull, boring pieces to wear to NEW YORK of all places. Very, very strange choices in my opinion. She must have a new stylist or something because her clothing choices of late have been greatly lacking. Back in 2011-2012 she looked so chic and put together, and she glowed. Her choices in clothing are just doing nothing for her lately.
This dress is lovely and Kate looked gorgeous and elegant but really, how can you be SICK of a dress after only three (public) airings. If she bought two many new outfits at that price she would be slated in the British press as it is the taxpayer who foots the bill. As it is, she is admired for choosing high-street brands and wearing clothes several times at a time when wages haven’t risen for three years . There are many events at Buckingham Palace on a weekly basis plus private events where cocktail/evening dresses are still worn, even birthday parties at home can be black tie. The reason Diana auctioned clothes in the U.S. was because following her divorce she no longer needed so many. As for tiaras, this was not an occasion for one and seem pretentious these days. Great coverage of the visit!
I could not agree more!! 2011-2012 she was perfection! Her hair was incredible (due to former hairstylist that she stopped using at end of 2012) and her attire was awe inspiring! What happened, especially as of late? Kate’s entire NYC wardrobe was one big blur of bland, blah and boring…
I think the choice of earrings are a nod to the colors of St.Andrews.
RE choice of colours: if you Google University of St. Andrew’s tartan, you will get images of their pipe band in a tartan of dominant slightly smoky dark blue with some bright green. NOT the same as the scarves the students wear, but a very Kate choice for the event. Just my $0.02.
That’s a fantastic point which I hadn’t thought of! Makes me rethink my distaste for this color combo
Well spotted. A typically ‘royal’ nod to the event. The tartan can also be seen in the photo of St. Andrew’s gift shop items that WKW has posted above. I’m very curious to know where the jewellery came from–it looks familiar to me, but then I don’t have a good memory for that kind of detail. I hope some sleuth figures it out for us. In any case, Kate looks absolutely perfect tonight, radiant, glowing, and that dress looks even better on her pregnant figure.
I LOVE this dress so much! She could wear it a dozen more times and I would think it’s still equally as beautiful as the first time she wore it. I do love that she wore her hair up this time. It really showcases the beautiful neckline of the dress. The jewelry was stunning! I bet it was so lovely for them to see Eugenie. Well done! Thank you for that wonderful post!
Gorgeous jewelry, wondering if it was a private gift from Middle Eastern royalty… as someone upthread noted. Seems logical and follows the pattern of previous big jewelry items from the past few decades!
Just curious. Why would “middle eastern royalty” give the Duchess jewelry? Certainly not as a wedding gift since they requested charitable donations in lieu of gifts. Neither Kate nor William have been on a state visit to any middle eastern country, that I can recall. I would imagine the jewels were a gift from her husband or possibly her parents.
It is not unusual for Middle Eastern potentates to give jewellery for Royal weddings. Diana was given a tray of various precious stones when she married by (I think) Saudi Arabia.
But, William and Kate specifically requested NO GIFTS and, as far as I know, the guests did as asked. If expensive jewels were given they would have been announced, as Diana’s jewels were.
I don’t think any of us is in a position to say what all the guests did about gifts, whether they observed the “no gifts” request. It is true that many middle-eastern monarchs have previously given quite lavish gifts of jewels to members of the British royal family. The request was not an inviolable law, after all, it was not binding on anyone, and some foreign monarchs might have preferred to observe their own, already-established customs of making lavish gifts.
The Duchess looked so happy and glowing tonight. This Packham gown didn’t blow me away the first time I saw it. But tonight everything is perfection, from her updo to the gorgeous jewelry. Well done.
Also, Susan, are you sure the price of the tickets was $10,000? I thought it was more like $100,000. $10,000 would not be “staggering” by New York standards 🙂
Actually I read that it was 10K a number of places and that they were actually having a hard time selling tickets to the event. As much as the media likes to make it look like Americans as a whole (and especially New Yorkers) can’t get enough of William and Kate most actually seem to not care all that much at all.
I think it was $100,000 if you bought a table and $10K per ticket.
$100,000 for a table (10ppl)
I’m a St Andrews graduate from the U.S. and I was invited to the party, so I can tell you about ticket prices. $100,000 or $50,000 for 10-person tables (I’m assuming the price difference was due to their relative positions, it’s not clear on the invite). There were also a “limited number” of $25,000 tables and $2,500 single seats.
As a St Andrews alum who was invited to this event (but alas couldn’t afford to go), yes, there were individual tickets for 10,000. An entire table was 100,000.
I also love this gown, but would have loved to see a new maternity look. The emerald jewelry is an interesting choice with a deep blue dress. The colors don’t quite make sense together to me, but still the glittering of all those jewels with the gown is striking. Thanks for a great series of posts, sad the royal visit has come to a close!
I loved the emeralds with this dress, only wish she had the courage to wear the matching necklace as well.
I wonder who the gift was from, and what the occasion was. What was the Queen’s wedding gift to Kate? Some folks suggest that this might be a wedding gift from Arab royalty. I guess we’ll never know, but I’d be very surprised if she received the set as a wedding gift and didn’t find the occasion to wear it until now. In all likelihood it is more recent…
Finally! Gorgeous jewels appropriate for a black tie event – good weight and great color for her. Well done!
The dress is lovely. I now have a hatred for suede heels though.
The suede heels echo the velvet waist adornment, perfectly done in my book.
That bracelet at least looks very similar to the emerald bracelet that Diana was loaned or gifted by the Queen from Queen Mary’s family Cambridge emeralds. Don’t recognize the earrings, however.
Definitely not those -Queen Mary’s are round or oval-ish, these appear to be square. I’m certain there was a complete parure as a gift, similar to the ruby and diamond necklace/tiara and earrings she wore with the velvet A McQueen dress while out with William & Harry.
Finally! Gorgeous jewels appropriate for a black tie event – good weight and great color hor her. Well done!
I agree 100%.
I agree its about time she started to wear the heavy metal,want to see tiara though, lets show the world what proper bling looks like.
While at first I was bummed to see a repeat- this is my favorite of the three looks we’ve seen. Plus they just look so happy – the picture of them leaving – looks like Will’s shirt has come undone and they look tired but so happy. Is Kate’s hand on her bump? I can not even handle the cuteness.
I thought that at first look, but on closer look think it is the lining of his jacket
Ah yes I agree – they still have that “happy couple leaving big party” look though, and it just thrills me to see!
Yes. I think you’re right about the exposed white lining in William’s jacket. The next time his tailor makes William a tuxedo, he should definitely change the color of the lining so it can’t be mistaken for a shirt.
Fabulous coverage of the tour, Susan!! Thank you!!
Terrific coverage! Thank you!
She looks spectacular tonight in that dress and hair, but I can’t stop staring at those earrings. WOW!!
Princess Eugenie looks amazing with her sleek hair. The best I’ve ever seen her! She looks like a model.
Ooh, this is a repeat I’ll take happily! What a terrific, glamorous look this is with an up-do; this appearance is hands-down the best amongst the three, and I’d say it’s at the top of her formal looks. I love that she threw in some bling to keep us from being too disappointed with the repeat, and I’m glad to see her in some serious jewelry, but I have to say that the emeralds seem a bit incongruous. I know the dress photographs blue/green/black depending on the light, but I think this is a dress MADE for sapphires.
In terms of the repeat, I think that because this is not a major overseas tour, it isn’t as much of a surprise as it might have seemed initially. I think she looked beautiful, and the cut of this really flattered her little bump.
She nailed it tonight!!! I was not a fan of the dress the first time she wore it because I thought it highlighted how thin her frame is but tonight it fits her perfectly, IMO. But even more importantly than the fit she wore her hair up which perfectly compliments the neckline and shows off the new earrings and bracelet. Wow, I’d love to know who the jeweller was but if they were a private gift that may be hard to learn? Wish I ran in that circle and could have been there tonight to see both of them in person!
I had a funny feeling that we were going to see this Packham dress again. It actually occurred to me the other day that the Duchess might wear it to the Met.
I’m delighted to see her wearing it with an updo. I would have preferred her to wear all-diamond/silver earrings with it (I once suggested her art deco drop earrings as a good choice for this dress), instead of the emerald set, and I do wish she’d try the full, off-the-shoulder effect that the designer intended.
All in all, however, if we weren’t to see a new dress, this one was a very good choice.
Like you I’d had a premonition this dress might make a showing tonight, and maybe with the much hoped-for updo and bling. We’ve escaped too long without a repeat and she has favoured darker tones for evening this winter.
Just a lovely, classic beautiful gown. The Duchess has worn it for the third time now and it looks a bit different every time with the change of jewellery & hairstyle. I’m glad she wore earrings only and no necklace as the neckline of this gown is wide, flattering and just lovely on its own. Kate’s hairstyle too is top notch – this gown calls for an updo. All up – a fabulous look.
Ditto!
(Although I cannot imagine how heavy those beautiful earrings must have been.)
I also love this dress, especially with the gorgeous updo. How can she have such a tiny waist and be 5 months pregnant! Amazing. She looks happy and glowing.
I’m not crazy about the earrings. They just don’t look like Kate and her modern sensibilities.
I agree. The earrings are very mid twentieth century. They look like something Princess Margaret might have worn in the 1960s.
Originally, I thought the jewelry clashed. But it looks like Kate was echoing the colors of the St. Andrews tartan. In that case, perfectly appropriate.
And, if you are so moved, you can buy lots of tartan stuff at the St. Andrews University store. http://standrewsuniversitystore.com/Special-Collections/Tartan
I have to admit, this is my favorite of her formal dresses. I love everything about it, and I especially like that her hair is UP!
Also, can you imagine receiving that jewelry as a gift?! I think my jaw would actually, physically hit the floor.