Skip to Content

Kate in Glittering Diamonds and New Family Order for State Banquet

The Duchess dazzled as she arrived at Buckingham Palace for tonight’s state banquet. The evening is in honor of King Willem-Alexander and his wife Queen Máxima of the Netherlands, in London for a two-day state visit.

Arguably the most notable thing Kate is wearing is not jewelry (although there’s plenty to chatter about on this front), but the Royal Family Order, seen on her left shoulder.

Historically orders are miniature portraits painted on ivory. The tiny portraits are worn atop a silk ribbon. Here you see the royal family orders for (left to right) George IV, Edward VII, George V, and George VI.

The Royal Family Order of Queen Elizabeth II is a gift personally bestowed by The Queen to female members of the Royal Family. Here you see it on Sophie, Countess of Wessex.Sophie Wessex gown family order

The image of the Queen shows her in formal attire and wearing a tiara. The oval is surrounded by diamonds topped by a red enameled crown. One element of Kate’s order marks a significant change: it is painted on glass, not ivory. 

Simon Perry of People reports the Duchess first wore the order in December of last year at the Queen’s Diplomatic Reception.

Back to the jewels, starting with what is becoming Kate’s go-to tiara, the Lover’s Knot.

A refresher via this Vogue story:

A Kensington Palace spokesperson confirms to Vogue that Kate Middleton wore the Lover’s Knot tiara paired with Queen Alexandra’s Wedding Necklace. They were first spotted on the duchess through the window of a Bentley, perched delicately around her head and neck.

The Lover’s Knot tiara is quite the adornment, containing 19 diamond arches decorated with 38 drop-pearls. It was commissioned for Queen Mary in 1913, made by British jewelry house Garrard.

Now to the gems we see shimmering on the Duchess’s neck. A hearty “thank you” to all who pointed out this is Queen Alexandra’s Wedding Necklace.

We learn more from Her Majesty’s Jewel Vault:

The necklace features 8 pearls surrounded by diamonds, each connected with festoons of diamonds, and three detachable diamond and pearl drop pendants. Queen Mary gave the necklace to Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother, and she wore it constantly. The necklace was finally reunited with the brooch and earrings when The Queen inherited it in 2002; we have yet to see her wear it publicly.

And from the Royal Order of Splendor:

I thought this worked very well for the Duchess. It didn’t overpower her the way I thought the Nizam of Hyderabad did when worn back in February 2014.

Many also noted that Kate is wearing Diana’s Collingwood pearl earrings.

A look at the senior royals at tonight’s banquet, from left to right: Queen Máxima, King Willem-Alexander, The Queen, the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall. 

HM was wearing the Girls of Great Britain and Ireland tiara. Order of Splendor shared, “The Queen is wearing the Cullinan III and IV Brooch, “Granny’s Chips”! Special nod to a Dutch visit, as the Cullinan was cut in Amsterdam.”

Those of us fond of shiny, sparkly things were simply giddy when we saw pictures of Queen Máxima.

Why? Because she was wearing the Stuart Tiara. More from this Hello! story:

The Dutch royal’s outfit was accessorised with an extra-special headpiece – the Stuart tiara featuring the Stuart diamond – which made its first appearance since Queen Juliana’s 1972 State Visit to the UK. The 47-year-old wore her blonde hair in a chic updo, and her makeup was suitably glam, with lashings of mascara and a red lip.

And from the Royal Order of Splendor:

Whatever you want to call it, it is the grandest set in the substantial Dutch royal collection, and it houses perhaps the single most important stone in the collection.

The tiara is part of a set, or parure, of jewels including a huge necklace and a bow brooch so big you might as well call it a stomacher.

That is one extraordinary brooch! The Duchess of Cornwall wore the Greville Tiara, which The Court Jeweller points out “Most of us used to call it “the Boucheron Honeycomb Tiara,” but in 2012, we learned that the royal family simply calls it “the Greville Tiara.”  It was originally made by Boucheron for the Hon. Mrs. Margaret Greville, DBE, who bequeathed it (and many other jewels) to Queen Elizabeth (later The Queen Mother) in 1942.

Now for a look at Kate’s Alexander McQueen gown. As soon as I saw it I swear there was an ear-splitting cry of “prom dress!” echoing across the Twittersphere and blogosphere. And for those who didn’t have a prom dress with some of these design elements, how about a bridesmaid dress? 

The dress is done in a color called “Kingfisher blue,” kind of a blue-grey. I don’t believe I have ever seen the Duchess in a mermaid or trumpet style design before. (I’m going with ‘trumpet’ because the flare starts above Kate’s knee.) Am I forgetting things from the early days, years before the wedding?  The fabric is just beautiful, and the neckline flattering on Kate. We know the Duchess loves a figure-skimming silhouette.

I think the challenge comes with the skirt. Where you take the angles and hard edges of the knife pleating and ruching and combine them with the soft rosette at the shoulder, the angular vee where the fabric flares out and the very full skirt, it feels like there is an awful lot going on. This is likely to be one of those designs that we all respond to strongly, either a “love it” or “hate it,” I don’t see a lot of, “meh.”

The thing that struck me was that I couldn’t remember Kate in this silhouette, nor could I recall McQueen designs like hers, and I started to think I was nuts, not being able to remember similar looks or designs. Surely there were McQueen pieces somewhere in the lineage that would act as markers, offering a clue to the development of Kate’s frock. I did a little looking around on the interwebs and did find this piece.

It is a 2007 design, from the S/S collection. It’s not Kate’s fabric, I’m not suggesting that. But it was fascinating to see there were pieces in the archives in styles I had completely forgotten!

We did not see what shoes Kate wore tonight, but we could see that she had a new clutch and wore one of the diamond bracelets we have seen at previous state dinners. Some of tonight’s photos are a little blurry, like the one you see below.  I have not had time to look for the bag but expect to have time tomorrow to do that.

UPDATE Wednesday night, 10/24: Laura suggested Kate might be carrying Jerome Rousseau, and it looks like she is probably spot-on.  

UPDATE #2: UFO No More reports the bag is actually a Jenny Packham design, the “Belle” style. 

It was fun seeing everyone wearing white-tie this evening. We will see Kate again next week but in a more casual environment; here’s more info from our Kate’s Calendar page.

  • Tuesday, October 30: William and Kate will visit Coach Core Essex. TRH will meet new apprentices, hear from graduates, and learn how the scheme in Essex is engaging a diverse local community with sport.

 

 

Pin It

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SBrown

Wednesday 7th of November 2018

This dress is GORGEOUS - one of my favorites so far. I love the top that is so fitted and becoming, and the bottom is so-so. However, the ornate necklace with such a detailed bodice plus the rosette plus the brooch is way too much. I would much prefer to see this with tiara, earrings and bracelet; no necklace is needed, and certainly not a heavy one. The dress is attractive in light blue, but I'd love to see it in a richer color as well. Her hair is beautiful as usual - I like the chignon on her. A dress like this would make the wearer feel like a princess - or a duchess!!!

Sian Jones

Friday 2nd of November 2018

I don't understand references to a 'mermaid' look, surely a 'mermaid' skirt is a very close-fitting sheath? I don't understand why the colour, a very muted pale duck-egg blue has been described as 'kingfisher' either. This was done in Britain, but if anybody in the U.S. wants to google 'Kingfisher bird UK', which is where the colour name comes from, Kate's dress looks nothing like it, a particularly bright shade of mid-blue. Kate has worn flared duck-egg/aqua blue before, it'ls just the drop-waist is different this time, the fitted bodice suits her slender frame, I suppose when you have to have so many evening gowns & she will need many more as she & William take on more of the Queen's evening engagements at the Palace, there is bound to be a lot of similarity. A lot of Diana's clothes auctioned/given to Museums were very similar.

admin

Friday 2nd of November 2018

Hi Sian, as a rule, the specific name of a color comes directly from the designer/retailer. :)

Becka

Tuesday 30th of October 2018

Here's a quick thought on this dress. I think the fussiness ( for lack of a better word ) of the bottom half of the gown helps balance out the heaviness of the top half - all the jewelry, the rosette, the order... I believe the outfit works when this is taken into account.

Karen

Sunday 28th of October 2018

I think the dress is way too long and I’m not a fan of the mermaid bottom. However, she looked absolutely beautiful- hair, tiara, that necklace!!! Is it just me, or does she have faint tan lines from a swimsuit top-??

sue d

Tuesday 30th of October 2018

I love the top of the dress but cannot stand the shape of the skirt bottom. LOVE the jewelry, hair, giant necklace. The dress looks awkward and too long also to me. I see the tan lines too!

Mary B.

Sunday 28th of October 2018

I haven't read all the comments, and I'm not the clothing expert that many here are. I'm just wondering if I am the only one who imagines people smiling a rather sickly smile when they receive a family honour? Yes, of course she deserves it -- she does great work in several places where she's taken up things the Queen used to do, her work on mental health is tremendous, etc. etc. etc. ... but wow, I find those things odd-looking! Can't imagine the outfit that any of them would look good with.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.