Skip to Content

The Duchess in Diamonds and Alexander McQueen for Diplomatic Reception

The Duchess was the picture of elegance this evening as she attended the annual diplomatic reception with Prince William.

Kate was in a new gown with statement jewels (including a ring!) for the white-tie affair at Buckingham Palace.  It is the sixth time the couple has attended the function. 

HM Queen Elizabeth II hosts the annual event, the highlight of the social season for many, with a guest list that numbers roughly 1,000.

More from The Daily Mail’s coverage:

The royal event is the largest reception held at Buckingham Palace, requiring hours of intricate planning by the Master of the Household and the Marshal of the Diplomatic Corps, as well as the commandeering of almost every member of waiting staff.

UPDATE: Richard Plamer reports there were 950 guests at last night’s reception.

Also attending this evening’s affair, the Prince of Wales, just visible in the photo above, and the Duchess of Cornwall. Here you can see the two Duchesses along with Prince William.   

Below, the three royal women.  

The event is attended by ambassadors, high commissioners, and roughly 600 foreign diplomats based in London, as well as British diplomats and notable public figures.  

More on the evening’s activities from this Hello! story referencing the schedule used at the 2017 reception:

Guests were also split into two sittings, the first from 7 to 8pm, taking place in the State Dining, the Blue Drawing and the White Drawing rooms. The second supper, from 9 to 10pm, was served in the Picture Gallery, Green Drawing and Ball Supper rooms. During that time members of the royal family greet guests and there’s also an opportunity for dancing in the Ball Supper Room after the buffet.

The Duchess chatting with guests.

Now for what the royals wore for the evening party, beginning with HM, who was in a gown by Angela Kelly. 

HM had on the Vladimir tiara, which can be worn with pearl drops, emerald drops, or no drops at all; tonight, we saw emeralds.  She also wore the Greville Emerald Earrings; a pair inherited from the Queen Mother in 2002 per The Court Jeweller, who also notes HM wore two art deco bracelets, both by Cartier. Here is a closer look at the glittering diamonds and emeralds.  

The big news was the Queen’s necklace, apparently a piece never before seen according to royal jewel experts The Court Jeweller and The Royal Order of Splendour.  The jaw-dropping piece features “square faceted emeralds in diamond clusters with diamond spacer ornaments and diamond and cabochon emerald drops,” according to The Court Jeweller’s report

If I’m not mistaken, HM doesn’t debut many significant pieces of jewelry, so it was a treat to see her in this tonight.

The Duchess of Cornwall wore a cream embroidered gown by Bruce Oldfield and the Greville Tiara.  The Court Jeweller reports the Duchess also wore “one of her signature diamond and pearl choker necklaces and the grand diamond earrings from her demi-parure. She also wore a diamond bracelet on her left wrist. (Sadly, I do not have good photos of those items.)

More on the tiara from Royal Order of Splendour:

It was made by Boucheron for the Hon. Mrs. Greville (a well-known society maven) in 1921 out of stones salvaged from another tiara. Having no heirs of her own, she left her considerable jewel collection to Queen Elizabeth (the future Queen Mother) when she died in 1942. With wartime austerity in place, the inheritance slept in the vault for a couple years before Queen Elizabeth began wearing the tiara. Not too long, though: it was in use by the late 1940s.

Now to the Duchess of Cambridge, who was in a navy velvet evening gown by Alexander McQueen per journalist Victoria Murphy.

The dress features a fitted bodice, long sleeves puffed at the shoulder, and a neckline similar to a jersey knit gown by Alexander McQueen at Saks ($7290) shown below. It does not have the lace/bejeweled insets at the waistline or the back or quite as much puff at the shoulder seam, and because it is velvet, it drapes differently, but this does give you a look at the sweetheart neckline on a ready-to-wear piece.   

Thank you to Regal Monarchist on Twitter for sharing the McQueen gown link.

Now for a quick review of Kate’s diplomatic reception looks over the years. Below, the Duchess attending the reception this evening, last year when she wore Jenny Packham, and in 2016 when she also was in a Jenny Packham design. 

We do not have any photos from 2017 other than through a car window.  

In 2015 and in 2013 Kate wore a lacy design from Alexander McQueen. There were no interior photos that were released from either year; we only saw the gown via a screengrab from an ITV documentary.  

The practice of allowing a pool photographer to shoot pictures for release to the media is recent. Previously there were no photos released, or we would see one or two from the very beginning of the event, so this is a nice development that looks like it may become a permanent practice.

Moving to the rest of Kate’s ensemble, many immediately recognized Kate’s tiara, the Lover’s Knot. 

The Royal Order of Splendour notes the tiara “sticks to the basic design common in other lover’s knot tiaras, featuring pearl pendants dangling from diamond knots in a diamond framework.” It was made by Garrard, commissioned by Queen Mary in 1914.

The Court Jeweller points out the “lover’s knot motif was very popular in the nineteenth century; the knots are the pretzel-like elements at the top of the tiara — the part from which the pendant pearls are suspended.” In this photo from tonight, you can see the band at the bottom which helps holds the tiara in place, is covered in dark brown velvet to blend in with Kate’s hair color. 

And from The Royal Order of Splendour: “Queen Elizabeth II inherited the tiara on Queen Mary’s death in 1953 and wore it herself earlier in her reign. The tiara gained world fame when she loaned it to Diana, Princess of Wales following her 1981 marriage.”  

On the far left below, you see the Duchess wearing the Lotus Flower tiara to this event in 2013; beginning in 2015, the Duchess has exclusively worn the Lover’s Knot tiara for the reception. I think the tiara will also be associated with the Duchess as it has become a signature piece for her.    

The Duchess also wore the Nizam of Hyderabad necklace this evening. On loan from HM, we first saw her wear the piece to a 2014 National Portrait Gallery engagement

The necklace was a wedding gift for the then-Princess Elizabeth.  Below you see HM wearing the necklace in a photo used for the cover of Elizabeth: Reigning in Style, a book studying the Queen’s wardrobe over the decades.

The double-drop pendant has 13 emerald-cut diamonds and can be detached from the chain of 38 brilliant-cut open-back collets — more from Artemisia’s Royal Jewels blog.

One of the most beautiful gifts came from the Nizam of Hyderabad. The Nizam was the owner of one of the most celebrated and largest private jewellery collections in the world, and his gift was suitably impressive – a demi-parure of a tiara and necklace.The necklace was purchased from Cartier.
 
Actually, in a way it was acquired by Elizabeth herself: the Nizam wasn’t in London at the time and left Cartier instructions that the Princess will personally choose her present.

The Royal Collection has a good photo of the necklace.

The Royal Collection

The ring is unusual because we don’t often see Kate wearing rings other than her engagement/wedding/eternity rings. The Duchess was also sporting shimmering earrings and a diamond ring we’ve not seen her wear before.  

UPDATE 12/12: Franck suggests on the History of Royal Jewels message board that it is “the diamond ring from the Diamond Chandelier Drop Demi-Parure (from King Fahd of Saudi Arabia – 1987 state visit).” He also notes “Queen Elizabeth II wore the ring during a state visit in Germany in 1992.”

Emma 4 Royals suggests the earrings are part of the Diamond Chandelier Drop Demi-Parure, a necklace and earring set worn with some frequency by HM. The earrings were also seen recently on the Countess of Wessex, in June at the state dinner. I think Emma’s theory is probably correct. Below, a photo from the state dinner. 

You can read more about the set in this Queen’s Jewel Vault post.

Kate was wearing her Royal Family Order on her left shoulder.  Personally given by HM to female members of the Royal Family, Kate first wore the order in December 2017.  It features a miniature portrait of the Queen painted on glass, surrounded by diamonds topped by a red enameled crown. We show it as worn to the Netherlands state dinner in October 2018 so you can better see the portrait (l) and again tonight (r).  

The Duchess also had on the sash and badge associated with her status as a Dame Grand Cross of the (GCVO) Royal Victorian Order.  The honor was given to her on her eighth wedding anniversary this April as recognition of her service to the sovereign. Kate first wore the order to the United States state dinner in June.  

The badge (seen lower left as worn in June) is a Maltese cross with a medallion depicting the Royal Cypher of Queen Victoria on a red background, surrounded by a blue ring bearing the motto of the order. 

Here is a closer look at the badge. 

UPDATE 12/12: Jewelry expert extraordinaire Franck, who left a comment with the fab info about Kate’s ring, also commented about a brooch holding Kate’s sash in place.  You can see that at the June state dinner she used her oak leaf/acorns brooch at the right shoulder.  Last night the Duchess did have something on her right back shoulder that looks like it is holding the sash in place. Franck, who knows far more about royal jewels than I, suggests it is a bar brooch. I don’t 100% agree, it doesn’t look like a bar brooch to me, but it is almost impossible to tell from the one tiny photo I have what it is, exactly. Below, an image shown above of Kate shaking hands; I have added the best detail shot I can find to the lower right corner. 

It almost looks like there are triangular pieces or shapes at the end and sides….? Does it look that way to anyone else?

We’ll leave you with one more photo from this evening. 

LINKAGE:

 

 

Pin It

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Lindsay

Friday 20th of December 2019

Queen Victoria, the first monarch to live in Buckingham Palace, hated it because it was freezing and huge. She couldn't get the servants to light enough fires, which drove Prince Albert crazy. She almost caused a constitutional crisis when she decamped for Balmoral and refused to come back after Albert's death. I imagine that the heating system has been modernized, but it may be no accident that Queen Elizabeth leaves every weekend for Windsor and spends a lot of time at Sandringham and Balmoral or the other estates. It seems like no one really wants to live in Buckingham. A velvet dress with long sleeves may be much more comfortable in a large hall. Note that the men are all in very warm clothes. Not fair for the ladies to freeze!

BlondieBlueEye Eight

Saturday 21st of December 2019

Lindsay you have a very good point and if I have a formal event I will dress with velvet, velours with either 3/4 or long shelves. You are right the men a wearing suit jackets, if it is cold in the palace they are quit comfortable. I think that Kate reviewed many style gowns from Kate's go to Designers and the Alexander McQueen gown was the one that had the neckline to wear that beautiful necklace, ribbons, brooch etc. You can see from the original gown, they change the panels & material. The designer without a doubt had the measurements of the necklace and where it falls and ends, so it fits perfectly. I now can see some of the back, they made the back a little lower so that when you see the front of the gown , it gives an illusion that it might be a low back skillfully done and the shoulder pads give the dress more structure to display all the items Kate is wearing from jewelry and on. This same event previously she wore diamond bracelets. With this dress she wore instead a cocktail ring with the beautiful midnight blue velvet long sleeves that show off the ring and ear rings beautifully. This gown flows and fit her perfectly even in length, I think she had at least one fitting this time with the shoes she was going to wear. My feeling we are going to see a pair of midnight navy velvet pumps with another outfit some day. ?. Also the Queen looked fabulous with emeralds & diamonds dripping ?.

Stacey

Wednesday 18th of December 2019

I'm very undecided on the dress, as I despise sweetheart necklines and this one is odd, yet Kate still looked very nice. I think the Queen definitely stole the show! I LOVE the tiara when she puts the emeralds in it, which I've found to be rare. I'm glad she busted out some extra jewels, since I know she isn't a huge fan of that. She was the best dressed person in the room!

Bonnie

Monday 16th of December 2019

Everyone, check the video on the Instagram link below, to see Kate and William cooking with Mary Berry. Let's hope places outside of the UK will eventually be able to view the entire show. It looks to be full of fun and good humour.

https://www.instagram.com/kensingtonroyal/?hl=en

admin

Monday 16th of December 2019

Thank you, Bonnie! :)

Larissa

Sunday 15th of December 2019

I am not over the moon for this look but it does have some very lovely elements that put this dress ahead of some of the others Kate has worn for diplomatic receptions in the past. I am a big fan of the sweetheart neckline, it reminds me of the beautiful McQueen worn to the Sun Military Awards (if I remember correctly) back in 2011. I'm actually surprised this design is based on and off-the-rack piece because I almost thought the necklace was chosen first and the neckline designed around it. In the few photos where you can tell the dress is navy (and not black) the colour is beautiful. I do think the sleeves are just a centimetre too long.

I like what Larsa said about the Lover's Knot becoming Kate's tiara for her Cambridge years, and my fingers are crossed that we get a look at a few more tiaras once we see Kate and William in different roles. While the Lover's Knot is, of course, a beautiful tiara, my main qualm with its constant use is that the pearls are so hard to pair with other jewellery. In this case it works, because the other statement pieces are all diamonds – but at the US state dinner earlier this year the tiara was a mismatch with the beautiful sapphire earrings.

The Queen absolutely stole the show tonight!! What a treat to see such a unique tiara, the emeralds look incredible against her white hair. And to think she is still debuting new jewels at the age of 93 – fantastic. Well done, your Majesty!

Caroline A.

Saturday 14th of December 2019

I have decided that I don't love this tiara worn with very dark colours. However, the gown possibly looked better in person than in photos and probably also looked nicer with the tiara than it does in the photos. It appears to be black in most of the photos and therefore looks quite severe. I suspect that it would have looked 'softer' on The Duchess in person. I'm not a big fan of the heavy tiara, heavy necklace and heavy earrings together. The look is not really Catherine who tends to be more minamalist in her choices of jewellery. Perhaps lighter pearl earrings would have broken the heavy look up a little. The Duchess must have looked spectacularly tall in this outfit. It is reported that she is almost 5' 9" tall, and as she usually wears 4" heels, and I guess that tiara must be at least 3" tall at its highest point, it would have made her appear to be approximately 6' 4" tall!

Perhaps The Queen's emerald and diamond necklace was a gift on her 70th wedding anniversary, or perhaps it was a gift in recognition of her 65 years on the throne?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.